| #1 JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni[36108] |
| huru59.wuh.wustl.edu |
First!
JPaikman |
| #2 -sexaholic-[36112] |
| 1Cust220.tnt11.alameda.ca.da.uu.net |
| DAMN ...SO CLOSE.. .ACK..ILL HAVE TO SETTLE FOR 3RD |
| #3 Sp|nE[36116] |
| dialup0206-pri.voicenet.com |
| i love you PeonSanders |
| #4 <font color=red> Sp|nE=Pen|s </font color=red>[36117] |
| clt92-181.carolina.rr.com |
I loe you Sp|nE
5th |
| #5 [z]RubberDucky[36119] |
| crtntx1-ar3-098-206.dsl.gtei.net |
| Nice report Wc3, it'll get atleast a 3-4. |
| #6 WilliamWC3[36121] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
Cool Ducky, you think so? Damnit someone read my report.
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr |
| #7 Jamellan[36123] |
| aden2-143.resnet.Colorado.EDU |
| Nice job!! And the first report to have me in it!!! WHEE!! |
| #8 Dr. Dre[36124] |
| 24.68.30.85.on.wave.home.com |
| Nice Report. Felt like another great episode of Simpsons. Anyway great job =] |
| #9 Sp|nE[36126] |
| dialup0206-pri.voicenet.com |
i started to try to read it .. but then my brain got too distracted from seeing my sister dance to the beatles so i decided to just skim the bottom half of the damn thing.
anyway, it's time for a Sp|nE version of this br:
Game 1:
Witty comment
Kingslayer gets doom fleet adn wins
More witty comments
Game 2:
Witty comment
Mutas + sunkens > infantry
witty comment
failed attempt to be witty comment
guards + crack > terran
referance to me (only good part of the br)
there william, i just wrote your whole damn br in about 45 seconds
|
| #10 [{o}][36127] |
| dialup-209.246.74.57.NewYork2.Level3.net |
<h1><font color="yellow">OWNAGE</font></h1>
BTW, WC3 where you get those really sexy bg. Do you somehow make em or what? |
| #11 Sp|nE[36131] |
| dialup0206-pri.voicenet.com |
| wow, that is one cruel rater ... a 7? |
| #12 Talon[36132] |
| cx110054-a.pwy1.sdca.home.com |
| huk huk |
| #13 TaloN[36133] |
| cx110054-a.pwy1.sdca.home.com |
| It was probably bob =[ |
| #14 Jamellan[36135] |
| aden2-143.resnet.Colorado.EDU |
| You know I think a requirement of raters should be a comment supporting their rating, cause i have no reason why that got a 7. And my own little rater that likes giving me sixes is bothering me cause i don't know who it is or the specific reasons as to why they gave me the 6. |
| #15 JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni[36137] |
| huru59.wuh.wustl.edu |
Okay,
Whoever gave the 7 needs to fess up. We're gonna chat
for a little bit.
JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni
ICQ: 28979437 |
#16  [36138] |
| dt031nf7.tampabay.rr.com |
I didn't rate it or read it yet, I'm working on my BR now.
Once its posted I'll read/rate etc. |
| #17 ::nobody::[36139] |
| dt0f4n84.san.rr.com |
7 ?!?!?
um...<i>right</i>
William, that was a kick ass report! I loved it as always!
keep up the good work and know that if i rated u get a big fat 10!~
Ciao!
::nobody:: |
| #18 HolyAnarchy[36140] |
| proxy1.roalok1.mi.home.com |
| YES! I AM NUMBER ONE SUCK OF ALL TIME! WOOOOOOOO! |
| #19 HolyAnarchy[36141] |
| proxy1.roalok1.mi.home.com |
| YES! I AM NUMBER ONE SUCK OF ALL TIME! WOOOOOOOO! |
| #20 Holy[36142] |
| proxy1.roalok1.mi.home.com |
Oh yeah, by the way William, gosu job...I almost shit myself when I saw it finally up there. Ownage br. Who the hell gave this a 7?! I loved it man, my mom was sitting near me and thinks im mentally ill from laughing at your witty comments so much. Maybe i am mentally ill. To quote my last 2 accidental comments,
YES! I AM NUMBER ONE SUCK OFF ALL TIME! WOOOOOOOOO! Octopus = gay map of the year. Ducky=Gosu partner of the year. Mutas=Gosu unit of the year. William=Gosu BR'er of the year. Ok im done now.
Holy |
| #21 Holy[36143] |
| proxy1.roalok1.mi.home.com |
| 1 more: Best quote of this BR: Wridiculous. Couldnt stop laughing. Ok i done spamming this comment section for awhile |
| #22 <font color=green> Sp|nE=Pen|s </font color=green>[36144] |
| clt92-181.carolina.rr.com |
Verey nice br pretty pictures and holy i suck more thna you so there
25th |
| #23 Dr.Zchivago[36145] |
| proxy1-external.bremtn1.wa.home.com |
<font face="Kristen ITC" size="+1"><b>Insane</b><i>!!</i></font>
Badd ass report. Obviously, that 7 won't stand. That was a malicious attack. This is 10 material if I ever saw it. Of course, what do I know?
Seeing the Rebel flag with the Red Star and the Nazi Cross was a little disturbing, but to each his own I suppose...
Awesome report.
-Dr.Z |
| #24 WilliamWC3[36148] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
ok before I have to respond to 80 comments at once..
PeonSanders: where the hell did you come from? and why did you have choose my report?
[{o}]: I make all my own backgrounds. These I made in pp8 by just taking a rectangle of solid yellowish-gold and putting a fancy bevel on it. The otherones I made in various ways, I_Hate_Medics and the one with Iced-Tree I took background tiles from starcraft.
:nobody: Thanks!
HolyAnarchy: Awesome. I'm glad you liked it. Finally I did a br on a comment spammer. Woohoo.
|
| #25 Holy[36150] |
| proxy1.roalok1.mi.home.com |
Yeah, that Nazi flag is a bit...distubing...*stares at William*
|
| #26 [z]RubberDucky[36151] |
| crtntx1-ar3-098-206.dsl.gtei.net |
| William - I'd do just like that if I could, it's just that I'm too stupid to make the top and bottom work =p |
| #27 WilliamWC3[36152] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
| yeah, I was trying to think of emblems appropriate for a number one suck tournament. It certainly wasn't pro-facist by any stretch of the imagination. |
| #28 Sp|nE[36153] |
| dialup0206-pri.voicenet.com |
HEIL HITLER!!
my next br has nazi monkeys, so it's good that everyone is in the fascist spirit |
| #29 Pika[36154] |
| ppp9082.on.bellglobal.com |
Favourite part of BR:
<i>"y doesn't blue have any meds? hes sexist."</i>
-sexaholic-
heh.
Good BR by the way, who gave this a seven? |
| #30 Herminator[36156] |
| 24.69.22.56.bc.wave.home.com |
Un-FIng-Believable
1 question
how the hell did this get a seven?
its..... WRONG
this is a 10!
|
#31  [36158] |
| fjwilson.reshall.ucsd.edu |
I don't know what it is, but I just didn't like the text much. All the complaining and gratuitious explanation of the 'suck' factor just seemed to take away from the pictures to me. And the picture collages were too small, not showing enough of battles. Yeah it was long, but I found the whole thing lackluster.
=( |
| #32 probe[36162] |
| 242849hfc219.tampabay.rr.com |
i agree with prae
no more asskissing, u asskissers
at least it got the 7 it rightfully deserves |
| #33 [z]RubberDucky[36165] |
| crtntx1-ar3-098-206.dsl.gtei.net |
| Don't mind probe, he has an alien drone up his ass |
| #34 Sp|nE[36169] |
| dialup0206-pri.voicenet.com |
gee thats a surprise, Praetor gave a very good report a poor rating
but don't worry praetor, i'll make sure that the next below expectations mark on my next br will be heavily influenced by the fact that you not only didn't like it, but that you were so offended that you small cock turns completely limp |
| #35 MikeyMonty[36173] |
| spider-ta065.proxy.aol.com |
I thought it was pretty entertaining, but the backround and those weird black bars made my head hurt. That combined with the font made this report a struggle to read, which is a shame, because your writing is funny. It really took away from the report's enjoyability. Another thing, I thought the pictures were nice, and I liked the way you blurred a lot of the collages(especially the opening builds), but sometimes it was so blurred I couldn't make out what was going on
On a whole a really nice report, but some of the weird extras you added hurt the report more than anything. |
| #36 Tullius![36175] |
| proxy4-external.rdc1.on.home.com |
| That was the best report I have ever read, other then one of Dagomar's. It definately deserves a ten. |
#37  [36176] |
| 98AB637C.ipt.aol.com |
OMG, this report screams, "<i>Look what I can do with Photoshop</i>" Even so, its still pretty good and funny in parts. The writing is definitely good.
My main gripe is, it seems like with each battle report you release, you get a little more crazy with the graphics. Most of your pictures were completely useless to me because they covered an area that was too small, thus I couldn't get a true sense of what was happening. The minimaps help to alleviate this problem to a certain extent, but IMO, nothing beats a wide screen action shot.
This report was just too loud, too many distractions, too many irrelevant things going on. I had problems following the actual game because of it.
I know I come off sounding harsh. Even after saying all that, I still think this report has a lot of good stuff in it. Enough good stuff to give it an 8 in my opinion so that's what I'll give it, an 8.
Cheers,
Dref |
| #38 JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni[36184] |
| huru59.wuh.wustl.edu |
Not to try to put you guys (the raters) down but:
Compare this report to some other recent 7's:
Report 2374
Report 2373
Report 2357
Report 2312
Also, why don't YOU try battlereporting on Octopus, which has to be the most crappy pathing map in Starcraft, plus its 256x256. I'm surprised that William could actually keep up with the action on large AND complicated map, that isn't played much so as to not be familiar readers(probably because it IS so large and complicated).
Additionally, other than writing a dissertation on how to write on complicated things without confusing the audience, you could always insert humor to keep the audience's attention. I think that this map would have turned off most readers once they start reading "green attacks the 4:30 base while blue sends defense from 3:30" - this confuses them further.
Furthermore, I think the value of this report lies in its humor. Writing a report on a complicated map like Octopus and being serious about it would likely turn many folks off. I don't know about you, but reading political game theory completely turns me off - its a big and complicated subject. If it was funny, yet at the same time I could learn something, it would be cool.
I won't criticize you guys further, but it seems now that MORE work, not less can actually hurt you. Sounds like we've reached the limitations of graphic design on battlereports, or also limitations on the maps we play?
We should rate not only for the humor of this report, but also for writing and communicating events of the battle, in the light of the relative difficulties of the map, game type (1v1, 2v2, FFA, etc.), and <gasp> speed of the game.
Because a report isn't "pleasing to the eye" (note to WC3 - colors don't match) shouldn't dock many points, or fractions thereof.
The Road Goes Ever On
JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni0 |
| #39 JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni[36185] |
| huru59.wuh.wustl.edu |
Oh and by the way, I disavow any association with any of Sp|ne's comments above - Praetor's cool!
And that last 0 in the message above - ignore it :-)
The Road Goes Ever On
JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni |
| #40 Faye_V[36187] |
| 24.65.81.66.on.wave.home.com |
Some of the past reports had good grading simply because of the people in it ... Mark4, Bob_the_whatever , johny hoho
Some of the past reports had bad grading cause of the map, bgh, bgh wannabe, bgh money :((
this report should get a 9 at least just for the good graphics hm dref ? as u said, a report to see how good u can do with photoshop
this kicked ass |
| #41 [36189] |
| ABD8FD22.ipt.aol.com |
Paikman, I understand your criticism and try to keep in mind that this report will probably receive a couple of more ratings before all is said and done. Notice I gave the report an 8 :-)
I think you'll find that different raters look for different things when they rate. I can understand why Praetor gave this report a 7. There WAS a lot of crazy shit going on in there that really detracted from what was actually going on in the game.
That's the point here. I understand that there was some hard work put into this, that's why I gave it an 8. But the collages were too many small pictures pasted together instead of 1 or 2 quality shots. They didn't really support the game or help me visualize what was happening. That is the point of pictures, to help the reader visualize what is going on. If they don't, then they don't need to be there. I don't care if your using Photoshop V5234.332 or MS Paint. Once again, this report just screamed, "<i>Look at all the neato things I can do with Phtoshop</i>".
I really thought the writing was good and there was some funny stuff in there. I think that when all is said and done, you'll find that William has a fair rating, and if it is a little lower than what you would expect, then what can I say, but better luck next time... ;-)
Cheers,
Dref |
| #42 Mogalin[36190] |
| cgowave-0-225.cgocable.net |
| The sheer effort should get it a 9 at least. |
| #43 Sp|nE[36191] |
| dialup0656-pri.voicenet.com |
but ... you have to actually REPORT the game. that is, after all, what we're doing here. although humor is nice, and most certainly a help, when we get down to the bottom line, we are just talking about a game of starcraft.
and i know the map was a bitch, but still - i had a TON of trouble following the first game. my brain was in puddles.
so yeah ... just remember, the main point here is to tell a tale of a staracraft game ...
oh, and praetor sucks |
| #44 ][~illuvatar~][[36192] |
| pamu117.wuh.wustl.edu |
| I'm probably going to be crucified for this, but i think Praetor was right in giving this report a seven. The whole thing was over done and though some graphic and witty comments can add flavor to a BR, too much of a good thing can be bad. I felt overwhelmed by the entire thing and the ubquitous side notes and comments made it difficult to follow what as going on with the story. The second BR was clearer and more concise, with your witty comments being fewer and more pertinent to what was going on in the game. |
| #45 WilliamWC3[36198] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
Ok, first to my critics. I spent many <i>many</i> hours writing this report and I happen to think that it is one of my better ones. I read your criticisms and went back over my report with them in mind and I still feel that way. I will admit that some of you have very valid points. I tried a lot of different things graphically speaking in this report that I haven't done before. Not all of them worked out quite like I had hoped but a bunch of them I liked and will probably use again. The point is that I am not willing to simply recreate I_Hate_Medics reports with slightly different games. I am always looking for something new and I know a lot of my readers appreciate that. As for the ratings I have always, though privately, held the opinion that the rating system is dumb. I always refrain from giving other reports pseudo ratings and try to avoid arguing about mine. People know if they did well by what the commenters to say. I certainly don't believe that raters are in any way more qualified than the average reader to give their opinion. Furthermore, I find the idea of giving a numerical value to an artistic work to be completely absurd. Of course that is just my opinion. Recently though I think report ratings are doing more to stifle creativity than anything else and are causing more harm than good. Personally I think a system of giving a report either a thumbs down if it is just trash someone spent fifteen minutes on, a thumbs up if it is something truely outstanding or no mark for all the rest would be a better system. Again I did not say any of this when I was getting 10.0's so think what you will about that. The point I'm not demanding any change, I just want to share my opinion so you understand. I plan to continue ignoring the ratings and ask anyone who feels similairly to do the same.
woah.. did I write all that, ok now to the people who like me.
Ducky: all you have to do is make the table put the middle as the background and then put the top and the bottom inside the table at the very beginning and the very ending. Also to make it look right you have to assign cellspacing and cellpadding to zero in the table tag. You can do view source and take my code if you'd like.
Herminator: Thanks!
PeonSanders: I'm am really sorry. I should have figured out which was your post and which was that loser. My comment was of course directed at the loser I just hadn't seen you around before so I didn't realize it was someone posing as you. Yes I have seen people who make derogatory remarks about themselves for no apparent reason. Oh well. Sorry again.
Tullius: Thanks!
JPaikman: Hey, thanks for backing me up.
KEEP COMMMENTING
-WC3
|
| #46 [36200] |
| ABD8FD22.ipt.aol.com |
Dude, I'm just trying to give you some constructive criticism. If you want to ignore it and go along with the attitude of "<i>He's just a dumb rater, he don't know shit. I'll just go along with the people that love me</i>" that's fine with me.
Anything I say is simply my opinion. But I don't go out of my way to cut people down, and I ALWAYS try to give my honest opinion.
Dref |
| #47 JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni[36202] |
| huru59.wuh.wustl.edu |
I lied. I am going to write some more.
Hey wait a second, no one's gonna get crucified or anything (][~Illuvatar~][). Everyone has their own opinion, which in their own minds, is right. The task is understanding other people's opinions.
Incidentally, after reading the report one more time, I retract the statement that we should view this report for its humor. Try reading the report, and not see the pictures. Its is one's best effort to describe long and complex game on a long and complicated map. Ignore the intermissions, ignore the flavor text, and just read the report. You find that not much humor is interspersed at all. Fine, you are viewing with the pictures, but most often they are efforts to shorten what might be longer. 5 shots to explain one battle rolled into one. Gratuitous use of minimaps (see suggestion in the last report).
From this basis, lets analyze distraction. I refer to my original argument above. People inherently recognize pictures more than words. Viewing pictures in and of themselves tells no story. Praetor feels distracted by the pictures. Of course he does, because the report itself is difficult reading! You have to sit there and picture in your mind where and when on an unfamiliar map. Again, I think you would agree that if it was temple, it would be so much easier to pay attention to the report, precisely because you are familiar with it. Read some of WC3's earlier reports, on simpler and smaller maps. I don't think the writing and graphics much different. I see the difference in the map.
Again, the point is,
pictures + humor >>>> report in THIS situation
almost always
====> distraction (almost always)
It seems like, from a reporting view, you are penalizing not on the writing itself, but the map. This shouldn't happen- like i said before, one should rate not only on style but also difficulty. Writing like this for Temple? A seven, maybe. For this SOB map? Like I said before, (which remains unanswered) you try writing this report.
How can any writing compete with pretty pictures? Is this a criticism AGAINST <gasp> the use of image editors to communicate funny things and ideas? Will we need 8 pictures (more confusion!) to explain a battle? Is OCTOPUS to be the bane of all future BRers? Is OCTOPUS just another word for Finnegan's Wake?
______________________________________________
BTW, I am also interested in gauging the ratings of the reports separately.
I am also interested in your comments comparing this report to other recent 7.5's (see comment above). The point is self-evident.
I am NOT here to complain about low ratings. I am NOT interested in "just because I'm the rater, deal with it." I AM here to stimulate discussion and debate, because, it is good. (self-evident)
The Road Goes Ever On
JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni
BTW: 3 Guesses as to who ][~Illuvatar~][ is. |
| #48 Talon[36204] |
| cx110054-a.pwy1.sdca.home.com |
| You can see why I stop doing battlereports. |
| #49 WilliamWC3[36205] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
Woah, Drefsab I have no idea where you pulled that out of unless you were just expecting to read it but, I never said anything of the kind. I said I read your criticism reread my report and even agreed with your criticism to some extent. I said I disagreed with the rating system. If you took my attack on the system as being against you personally I am sorry, it was certainly not intended thay way. If I accidentally insulted you then please point out where, I'm tired and perhaps I mis-spoke. And I certainly in no way made any effort to insuate that you were giving anything but your honest opinion. If you can find any evidence of that then I will sincerely apologize. Thankyou.
WC3 |
| #50 ChinksWithGuns[36206] |
| adsl-63-193-153-8.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net |
| This was one of the best written and humorous reports I've read. Should get an 8.5, but it kinda hurts your eyes after reading it for a while, and since this BR's kinda long, i found myself taking 2 advils every 10 minutes. Anyway, great BR, and collages owned. |
| #51 [36208] |
| ABD8FD22.ipt.aol.com |
Paikman, You said:
"<i>. I am NOT interested in "just because I'm the rater, deal with it." I AM here to stimulate discussion and debate, because, it is good."
Praetor and I are the only two people who have rated this report. We have both posted reasons why we rated it this way.
I'm done discussing it, I have no interest in writing a thesis on why William deserves a 7.5
William, I summarized your tirade as, <i>"I think the rating system is a joke</i>." I disagree. I think the rating system is helpful to people. When you diss the rating system, can you see how it might be possible for the raters to feel like your dissing their opinions as well since our opinions are reflected in the ratings that we give?
That's where I'm coming from...
Dref |
| #52 [36209] |
| ABD8FD22.ipt.aol.com |
oops, I believe the correct tag is /i
|
| #53 JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni[36210] |
| huru59.wuh.wustl.edu |
OMG Drefsab!!!!
Shame on you, read the comment before you post!
Before you get angry, I find that William's post is a criticism against rating in general. (Gee, stating the obvious) Try to UNDERSTAND his argument before getting angry (please?) I hope I am misunderstanding your comment above.
You would think that some guy with a lifetime average of 3.0 would say this, but in general, rating systems have the fallacies - as all things human DO have fallacies. He does have criticisms with the system, and, as a person who has made 10's, he has nothing to gain from criticizing the system (in fact he has everything to lose!!!) Nothing personal against you or any of the raters, but its just that he doesn't like the judging system. Fair enough?
Clearly, just because you can WRITE good reports doesn't mean you're a good judge of writing. Just because you can make pretty pictures doesn't mean that you are a good judge of artistry. People like what they like to see in general. Its like judging a papers. If you know what you're LOOKING FOR, then you're just as qualified, though maybe not ENTITLED to, judging.
I think raters are better than the average guy in two respects: they know how much work and effort a person puts into writing a BR, and they make judgements based through that lense. Secondly, they also are guaranteed (almost) to make fair judgements, and not base it on a certain derogatory comment against a guy that person dislikes.
Anyways, I really don't believe WC3 meant anything personal. I think its a philosophy in general. You do what you think is good or right, regardless of what other people say. That's fair. If you listen to what all the raters say and follow them to a word, you'll end up as clones of the raters. We don't want that do we?
I could make arguments against numeric systems, but its too big and too much. Another day (week) perhaps.
Yea! for more comments!
The Road Goes Ever On
JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni |
| #54 JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni[36211] |
| huru59.wuh.wustl.edu |
Awww, you let me down Drefsab :-(.
Your explanation is not enough for me :-(.
You should write more because discussion is good.
I like you! ;-)
The Road Goes Ever ON ------- crap Dref just stopped it -
JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni
|
| #55 Sp|nE[36212] |
| dialup0656-pri.voicenet.com |
comon guys, argue more. this nerd debate is fun
/me munches on more cookies
AHHH SHIT I HAVE SCHOOL IN 6 HOURS!! |
| #56 WilliamWC3[36213] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
Drefsab, sorry but I cannot agree that by stating that I don't like the rating system I am in any way "dissing" your or anyone elses opinion. I explained the reasons why I disagreed with the system in relatively clear language and if you read it instead of summing it up in one sentence you will see that it has nothing to do with the fact that the raters don't have valid opinions. I did say that I beleive rater's opinions should not be weighed more heavily than anyone elses. If you take this as an insult than I am sorry but I stand by my belief. In short, I still do not think you or any other rater had any reason to take offense to my post.
WC3 |
| #57 [36214] |
| ABD8FD22.ipt.aol.com |
Okay William you may be right, if I was wrong I will apologize after sleepytime... :-)
Dref |
| #58 Affire[36215] |
| CWIP-T-005-p-107-213.tmns.net.au |
Nice report, shame about the heated controversy in the comments section though =)
Is there any chance, I mean, ANY CHANCE at all of WilliamWC3 writing a text-only report? =) I liked this report, a little all over the place, but that I reckon that's Will's style and I kinda like it =) Sorta like the YRM reports of old. |
| #59 <MARQUEE>RS.anime(RS)</MARQUEE>[36216] |
| sfe-nm6-243.ix.netcom.com |
| Good good never have i seen such long comments and essays in a br, since Whoop's Hacker thing about Protozerg. |
| #60 <MARQUEE><FONT COLOR=0000FF>RS.anime(RS)</FONT></MARQUEE>[36217] |
| sfe-nm6-243.ix.netcom.com |
| Good god never have i seen such long comments and essays in a br, since Whoop's Hacker thing about Protozerg. |
| #61 JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni[36218] |
| huru59.wuh.wustl.edu |
See English Major Student debate on .Praetor's final installment to the Phoenix Legion Chronicles.
THAT IS TOTAL OWNAGE
The Road Goes Ever On Elsewhere
JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni |
| #62 [36219] |
| dt031nf7.tampabay.rr.com |
here's an idea -
don't get worked up overt a rating.
they don't mean much.
btw i'm not rating this, i couldnt bring myself to read more than 3 lines of this font.
|
| #63 <MARQUEE>RS.anime(RS)</MARQUEE>[36220] |
| sfe-nm6-243.ix.netcom.com |
| I let it sit here for an hour, and when i came back the ugly black stripe was gone. |
| #64 JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni[36221] |
| huru59.wuh.wustl.edu |
You can always change that. You can view all of your webpages in the font that you like by:
Bill Satan's IE 5.0 - Internet Options, then Accessibility, then click use default font. Change font via the fonts button.
Nutscrape 4.0 - Preferences, then Appearance/Font, then select use your default font. change the font by clicking the dialog boxes above.
JPaikman/ObiWanJebroni |
| #65 WilliamWC3[36222] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
I'm going to sleep too, but first I'd just like to say to Drefsab that perhaps both of us over reacted just a bit. Your criticisms were very good and I can see how a cursory reading of my reply might seem close minded. I should have seperated my response to your critisms and my mini-essay about the rating system. The only reason why I said all that stuff about ratings anyway was because people were arguing and I wanted everyone to understand that my lack of comment on my rating was neither tacit approval nor tacit dis-approval of the rating. This goes for previous and future reports of mine as well. Again, sorry for any confusion, frustration, anger, hate, blind rage, grief, remorse or anguish caused by my comments. Friends?
-WC3 |
| #66 GoT GaMe[36233] |
| user-2inisce.dialup.mindspring.com |
I think that this report is excellent. The fact of the matter is, people that judge other reports should keep the same mindset as to how they will judge the next br. And looking at how long this br it, William prob did take mucho time to work this out. I think that Jpaikman is right when he gave out those numbers of other reports. Y did those get 7's? YOu can look at my report too report 2175. Its a text only, and pics can only add to reports. I could only wish to make those kinds of graphics, which would very much help me on the next report i'm working on. the truth is, while my 7 report certainly has validation for its rating (i wrote it in one day), william has prob spent weeks on this one, and just for the effort, this definately is 9. And y do ppl moan over color, text? Besides the long load time on my 56k, it was an ez to read br. I agree that *sometimes* the rating system can be wierd (but not all the time). keep up the good work william, ur br's are ownage!!
And Lakers rule too!
GoT GaMe/The-Lakers |
| #67 [36237] |
| fjwilson.reshall.ucsd.edu |
To your first long comment JPaikman:
I feel my personal series of ratings is more or less consistent. Still, I do not rate every report, so I don't have to look at other 7's before giving this one my rating. I think some raters on this site are to lenient, I think some are too harsh. So don't compare to those other reports.
This is not a contest where you get points for performing difficult feats. If Octopus made the battlereport hard to follow, it made the battlereport hard to follow. WC3 doesn't get extra points for reporting on a hard map to BR.
Inserting humor always increases a rating. My point was, I didn't find it humorous. I disagree with you about rating in relation to the type of game or difficulty in reporting.
Lastly, my ratings always come down to one basic level. I rate by how I enjoy the report. Period.
Mogalin, while longer and more 'epic' reports are often more enjoyable, and therefore rated better, sheer effort does not compel me to rate higher.
WC3, on your first long comment. I think you hit the nail on the head here. A whole mess of people like your reports, and the changes you make. Good job. I for one have always found the comments section of a report far more important to me than actual ratings.
JPaikman (2nd long comment), my problem isn't with graphics in general. I disliked WC3's style of lots of little pictures in collages. As for "I am the rater, deal with it." This is not my attitude. I rate reports how I like them. I'm not going to rate contrary to how I feel about a report. Obviously, I am going to rate contrary to many readers much of the time. However, we raters are chosen in being able to give good (or at least justifiable) ratings on reports. I do that. Perhaps I simply have different taste, but there is certainly a population among the viewers sharing the taste I have. Perhaps a "JPaikman" style rater will come and give this report a 10.
Last little DrefsabWC3 thing.
Like I said, comments mean way more than questions. None the less, raters do serve a purpose, even if it is just to give some reports 2's so others won't read them. And perhaps we raters have no more moral weight than anyone else. Still, Johnny and Mark4 had this site up without a rating system for awhile, and that sucked. So I guess I'll keep on rating.
As long as you keep writing good reports too, that'll work just fine. |
| #68 <FONT COLOR=FF0000>RS.anime(RS)</FONT>[36246] |
| sfe-nm6-243.ix.netcom.com |
| Well that's the major flaw of this rating system, Opinion. Preaetor felt this report desvered a 7, and with him being a rater that's fair and square and valid. But we all know this is vastly superior to a text only report(Excluding Pheionx legion), yet it was givin a 7 because the rated flet it deseved that. Now we all know picture help a lot, but writing helps too, take mark4 for example he write reports that only include a minimap pic, yet he gets 9's, Why? Because the person that rated it felt he did a good job. Aprently Preator felt WC3, who put weeks of effort into this, deserved a 7, why?, because HE didn't find it to be 10 materal. Oh well it's a good system, and preator has made his deciseion. |
| #69 Sp|nE[36256] |
| 207.239.12.200 |
| Praetor, what DO you find humourous? |
| #70 BW-sux[36257] |
| bess-proxy.ba.k12.ok.us |
| Nice report. Gotta read it at home. The pics don't load at school. |
| #71 Tariq[36260] |
| 198.168.49.221 |
Thank god for my school's T1
#11 Sp|nE[36126]..........Incest anyone???? |
| #72 <font color=yellow> |]agomar[36272] |
| gateway.ncdsb.com |
A 7?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
OMG.
I'd give it a 10. 7 is ridiculous. Crazy. Nutty.
Probe rated my report a 7. He rates this a 7. Not nice. This report rules. Give it a 10. WC3 reports rock.
10
10
10
10.
OMG |
| #73 <font color=yellow> |]agomar[36273] |
| gateway.ncdsb.com |
PS Octopus is my favourite map. It's AWESOME.
I once played a 2.5 hour long 6 FFA game on it. It ended with me doing a tank push in the middle platform area. My BC fleet was too crippled to face his sunkens, so I built a factory in the first compartment after Yamatoing it. I produced tanks from there, and started a tank push. The rest 45 minutes took place in the center, and I ended up winning. |
| #74 [z]RubberDucky[36283] |
| crtntx1-ar3-098-206.dsl.gtei.net |
| That's nothing Dag, Nobody was going to report a 4hour (And no one was near dead between the two remaining players, one of which I wasn't any longer) 6 player ffa on PRimevil Isles. |
| #75 [z]RubberDucky[36284] |
| crtntx1-ar3-098-206.dsl.gtei.net |
PRaetor finds kicking ducky's ass on a map ducky doesn't know well using normal units (After prae had to give up carriers thanks to me over-raping obs ^^)
Prae also finds beating a toss w/ 4 rines and 2 vults funny (Scvs are allowed) |
| #76 Tariq[36291] |
| 198.168.49.221 |
| Lawd, its only now I bothered to read the bitching about 1 simple rating..........So sad |
| #77 [36307] |
| fjwilson.reshall.ucsd.edu |
| Ducky's right, I do find that stuff humourous =). I also enjoy 8-probe drops. You still reporting on those games ducky? |
| #78 [z]RubberDucky[36313] |
| crtntx1-ar3-098-206.dsl.gtei.net |
Yeah, I am.
|
| #79 TheCabbit[36314] |
| bgm-57-110.stny.rr.com |
| Dood, split ur BRs up. This is way too long 8( but I have no life so i'll read it!... |
#80  [36321] |
| 158.5.148.34 |
Ah, the rating system.
Let me put it this way. I'll scrap it when someone comes up with something better.
And yes, the raters are better at judging reports than the average reader. By practice if nothing else. |
| #81 [36334] |
| 98CAA066.ipt.aol.com |
William, I hope you understand that I do think this is a good report. Not great, and not as good as your other ones, but good all the same.
You irked me with your talk about the rating system because I think it works pretty well and all the raters seem to take it pretty seriously.
But I am un-irked now because after a good night's sleep and a hard day of work, I have realized that there are things out there more important then BR ratings.
No hard feelings, if you don't like the rating system, far be it from me to change your mind. :-)
Cheers,
Dref |
| #82 BW-sux[36336] |
| spider-we051.proxy.aol.com |
Random Quote: "Whoa. this isn't a Jamellan BR..."
Nice YRM inspired pics. Very good.
9
BW-sux |
| #83 [36374] |
| fjwilson.reshall.ucsd.edu |
Awww. Leuie =(. But I love Frenchy BR's!!
P.S. Thanks Ducky, I love seeing my name on screen =). |
| #84 WilliamWC3[36386] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
Ok, I have nothing better to do, I'll comment.
arrgh too many people to comment on, lets see where to start.
Praetor: Yeah basically I think we agree for the most part. Your not a big fan of my style and this report had even more of my style than usual so to speak. Plus I understand where I may have made mistakes and I respect your opinions. I don't care about the rating so I guess were still friends. And no one else should be pissed at Praetor either... although I love you guys for it.
King-Lewis: Thanks for the support.
TheCabbit: How could I split up my brs with Ducky egging me on like that.
Mark4: I understand why you have the rating system and in no way expect you to change it on my account. I personally have come to feel that a system of thumbs ups and thumbs down, or just giving someone bronze, silver, gold or that shiny thing, or even a star system like movies would be better than a decimal rating system but that is just my not-so humble opinion. (in other words, we're cool)
|]agomar: Thanks a lot!! Actualy I once played a 5 hour four player ffa on some 256 by 256 MOTW a while ago. (I think drefsab was in it as well although he only made it to the third hour) It turned out to be the closest game I have ever played. I won't tell you who one cause I might br it someday. Oh yeah and OCTOPUS RULES!!
Bob_the_Newt: grrr... I am not worked up over the ratings. If I was worked up at all I was just answering my critics which I take seriously whether they are raters or not. Some people seemed upset with the rating I got so I thought I'd explain my view, thats all.
RS.Anime{RS}: I'm not sure where you are coming down on this exactly but your comment was nice and I thank you for it. Oh yeah and please don't make anything scroll on my comments, grr... JV can't you disable that like you disabled images?
Affire: Thanks!! Yeah I have thought about doing a text only battle report. Some people obviously don't like my writing style too much but I am cable of writing.. Hmm everytime I think about doing one though I just think well I could add this picture here and then that picture there just to spruce things up a bit and then next thing I know I have 17 title images, 8 war maps, 50 bordered battle pics and a complicated background scheme. We'll see. I'll definitely keep it in mind.
PeonSanders: Thanks a lot. Heh a diplomat. I like tact, its a good way not to piss anyone off. Actually I've noticed that this community in general is a lot more tactful than any other internet community I've been around. Thanks for the comment.
LATER
-WC3 |
| #85 [36395] |
| 1Cust73.tnt1.rdu1.da.uu.net |
I gave it a 9 if anyone's interested, cuz I laughed my balls off. =]
I don't see where a non numeric system would be better than what we have now. Or I could give people directions on making a paper cut out that they stick to thier screen so they see only the "Rooks" instead of the numbers. =] |
| #86 [36397] |
| 1Cust73.tnt1.rdu1.da.uu.net |
I do like the decimal system because it allows for the greatest discretion in the rater's decisions. Takes a lot more thought than a simple thumbs up or down, and I like for people to think hard about a rating. The writer put his effort in, the raters should give that the respect it deserves.
I remember a while back raters wanted to be able to give halfs instead of just whole numbers for even more discretion. It seems like people want more differentiation rather than less.
Please respond back with a little more detail on your rating system ideas Willy. I have no illusions that the current system is perfect, just the best I've been able to come up with so far. |
| #87 WilliamWC3[36407] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
Ok well since you are interested in my idead, I'm flattered by the way, I'll elaborate a bit.
Your point that it forces the raters to consider what they give the report is a good one. My point though is that people don't really need to be told that this report is a 9.2 and this report is only an 8.7. My understanding is that the main arguement for this system is that it helps the readers quickly discern what is worth clicking on and what is not. This to me would imply a relatively general system with just a few categories (ie worth clicking on and not worth clicking on). To me all a decimal system adds is competition. This can of course be a very good thing but I have come to feel that this discourages atleast to some extent trying out of new ideas, particularly among the top writers who now have life time averages to worry about. I'm beginning to feel a bit like a baseball player..
Anyway, I think a more ideal system, and obviously not perfect, would be one in which one rater, whichever one happened to get to it first and felt strongly enough about it to rate it would give it either "Recommended, Highly Redcommended, or Not Recommended" with the appropriate Rook face to match if you'd like. Not recommended would take care of the short, partially unintelligible, one long parargaph, 4 pool reports which don't deserve to be deleted but which no one is going to honestly read and get anything out of. Highly recommended would be reserved only for the most excellent reports, or reports which are truely innovative, or even reports which have something really interesting or unique about them, such as a really good player, a brand new strategy or something else that you don't think anyone should miss.
Ok one more thing. I don't really have any evidence but I also feel that another flaw in the current system is that it discourages new people from writing. I think if people didn't have to worry that they would be given a four or a five for their first report and made to feel like it wasn't worth the effort more people might give it a try. Keep in mind that people will still establish themselves as good reporters, and will still get more comments and praise than others the longer they report and the more quality reports they write.
Another idea I thought of is a reporter of the week. Just something else that would go along with my idea of a non-decimal rating system.. more of a categorizing system I guess. I just don't like the philosophy behind the decimal system but perhaps I'm way off.
Ok, that was long. Sorry, please tell me what you think.
-WC3 |
| #88 DeezNutz[36414] |
| ABD022F1.ipt.aol.com |
The load time on this report makes baby Jesus cry.
But other than that.. Nice =]
|
| #89 [36416] |
| 98CAAA4D.ipt.aol.com |
I'll tell you what I think... teehee (<i>I know you're tired of hearing from me by now</i>)
I think no matter how you set up the system, there will be flaws.
Let's use your examples.
<b>Dagomar:</b> OMG<i>!!</i> Why isn't this report highly recommended???
<b>Probe:</b> How could you recommend this report? It was shit<i>!!</i>
And what is more intimidating then receiving a 3? Receiving the dreaded, Not recommended.
Ratings are completely subjective and know matter how you set it up, people will disagree. That's just the way things are.
I actually like the numbers better than your idea because it gives me more leeway. I can give the 1 to the idiot that writes a couple of paragraphs of spam and a 3 to the guy who thought it would be okay to write one really long paragraph on a game he played on Lost Temple. Whereas in your system, I would have to give both reports a Not Recommended.
Anyway, those are my thoughts on your ideas. I agree that the current system isn't perfect. But its been in place for a long time now without too much controversy. And I think its sufficient and serves the purpose that it was designed for.
And of course, all this is simply my opinion...
Cheers,
Dref
|
| #90 [36419] |
| 98CAAA4D.ipt.aol.com |
Hey Peonsanders, don't forget that there's a preview button to iron out those pesky HTML errors... :-)
If you write a report I promise not to flame you.
Dref |
| #91 [36425] |
| dialup-241-5.bol.net.in |
| 100th?? |
| #92 WilliamWC3[36427] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
PeonSanders: Thanks for commenting more even if you did compare my reportes to lesbian threesomes. Now there's an idea... Sorry, yeah I agree with your points just in my mind then the ratings aren't really necessary or perhaps they could be replaced by something better. My point really is that I ignore them.
Drefsab: You have some valid points. I know there will always be some who argue no matter what the rating system is but I think under mine there wouldn't be nearly as much. The point is that it would not be competitive. Reports given the highest rank would simply be reports the raters thought were note-worthy. Not neccessesarily excellent but in someway worthy of the readers attention. As for not recommended reports hopefully only reports which everyone could agree involved little time or effort would get this. I think this would involve a lot less controversy. Of course to some extent people will always be competitive but hopefully reporters and readers would understand that a Higly Reccomended is an honor givven by a rater and not something that one "earns"... if you understand what I mean (I'm not sure I do)
As for your other complaint it is my opinion that each reader should be allowed to decide for him / herself if a report is a 1 or a 3 with out having to read the "official" verdict first. I think the rating should be an guide to helping the reader find quality reports not an attempted measure of the reports "worth." But that is just my opinion.
oh btw, 100
-WC3 |
| #93 WilliamWC3[36428] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
Ok I just have to know... what idiot took my 100th comment and forgot to put their name there?
grrrr |
| #94 Limp_Bizkit666[36433] |
| 204.140.185.225 |
i swear WC3 took more than 400 pictures....god damn trigger happy finger!!!
DIE!
hehe, jk..
byeya
p.s-you rock my ass so much, ducky is getting jeolous..hehe |
| #95 <font color=yellow> |]agomar[36451] |
| static-39.itcanada.com |
ROFL!
Now that's a way to take the 100.
Your welcome William!
I agree with Mark4, BTW. If someone puts a huge amount of effort into something, a simple thumbs up or down isn't enough. For every hour someone puts into a report, 10 minutes should be put in by a rater, agonizing ;)
I also agree with Dref. Quite a few people thought my last report should get a 10, yet a couple others thought it deserved a 7. I ended up getting an 8. Perception is everything . . . . |
| #96 SuperGeneral[36454] |
| cr732571-a.pr1.on.wave.home.com |
I think I like it :) It gives you bragging rights :) Another thing would be that is
Not Recommended = Bronze
Recommended = Silver
Highly Recommended = Gold
It fits quite perfectly, no?
Nice report, I enjoyed it... at least a nine, if someone gave you a 10 then the average would be about right |
| #97 PsIoNiC~ZeRgLiN[36461] |
| sdn-ar-001nypougP212.dialsprint.net |
Listen, I don't see how in God's name this could actually get a friggin 7 and 8. I have read many reports, short and long, that are quite boring. Even though these reports may be long and hurt eyes, I swear to god, they are HILARIOUS! Now, lets give some constructive criticism =):
-Dref first: First of all, your reports are awesome, but I've never actually seen you get a 10. William, on the other hand, I BELIEVE got a 10 on something, and I can't believe that you would give him an 8. You write really good reports, but for crying out loud, they're SHIT COMPARED TO WILLIAMS'. I mean, the guy spends hours on these friggin things, the least you can do is give him a rating he deserves.
now, praetor.: OK, your rating was just screwed up (in my opinion, of course). I have read your reports, and the truth is, THEY PUT ME TO SLEEP. Williams' reports>praetor's. reports. I think if he generall is a better writer, then don't give him a lesser rating. I think this also might have to do with jealousy...
Of course, this is just my opinion, and I know I can't BR, cause my writing bites, and I have the html skills of a parakeet.
Good job WilliamWC3
my rating: 10
-ZeRgLiN |
| #98 PsIoNiC~ZeRgLiN[36462] |
| sdn-ar-001nypougP212.dialsprint.net |
Oh yeah, don't take anything personal, you guys reports don't suck, I'm just voicing my opinion. Also, in NH, a couple guys agreed with me that WilliamWC3's reports = YRM's reports
-ZeRgLiN |
| #99 [z]MRHD[36469] |
| resnet180-39.resnet.buffalo.edu |
Personally, I think that this was an excellent report, with both games well detailed, and an overall great presentation. In my opinion it is a ten report. Although I do see where the raters are coming from about the graphics, the writing itself seems by itself without any graphics deserving of a nine, and even if most of them don't show that much of what was going on, as Drefsab said, I think the atmosphere they lend to the report is incredible.
I think the last comments by Zerglin were a little uncalled for: Drefsab is in my opinion the comedy master of battle reports, and I think it goes without saying that Praetor is unmatched when it comes to fiction reports. They have their own opinions on what makes a seven, eight, nine, and ten report, and just because we don't agree with them sometimes is no reason to attack them for it. I think this report is one of the most entertaining I have ever read, but if everyone always agreed the world would be rather dull. :) |
| #100 [36482] |
| 208.196.35.239 |
./me tries to hold himself back... err... errrrrrr.... can't... shut... up....
Bite me Zerglin. I have my style, praetor has his, William has his. We also have our own opinions on what makes an interesting report. When you are rater, feel free to give any report a 10 that you think deserves it.
Dref |
| #101 WilliamWC3[36483] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
Limp_Bizkit666: Thanks.. I guess
|]agomar: Yeah I'm pretty much through arguing. The current system has its merits. I just wanted to share my opinions.
SuperGeneral: Thanks, yeah same thing about the ratings...
Psionic~Zerglin: Thanks for the support. I can't say I feel the same way about Praetor's and Drefsab's reports but to each his own. I'm really glad you enjoy my reports but there really isn't any need to put others down. They have their opinions and they spoke on them.
[z]MRHD: Thanks, thats kind of the way I feel about my report but I am about as biased as you get so its good to hear I'm not completely alone anyway. Thanks a lot.
-WC3 |
| #102 WilliamWC3[36485] |
| huru27.wuh.wustl.edu |
You tell 'em Drefsab.
This comment section will be longer than the report soon. |
| #103 Tariq[36502] |
| 198.168.49.221 |
| why don't you all talk about this in chat you have to much to say 8( |
| #104 <marquee><font color="ReD"><S>Khorne</s></font></marquee>[36529] |
| hl80-120-gw.dsl.mr.net |
Anarchy and ducky Rulz.=]
|
| #105 [36540] |
| fjwilson.reshall.ucsd.edu |
Well, despite the fact I have a desperately hard time trying to take seriously a person who puts their name in alternating caps and lower case, I will attempt to respond to PsIoNiC~ZeRgLiN.
First, a few quotes:
--"they're SHIT COMPARED TO WILLIAMS'."
--"Oh yeah, don't take anything personal, you guys reports don't suck"
Well, I'd take that personally if I didn't already know and dismiss there are people who don't like my reports. I'll only say two other things. One, you make the mistake of assuming everyone finds the same reports equally worthy. Two, feel free to open up my reports and take a gander whenever you have insomnia.
Phoenix Legion: Chronicles. Not only critically-acclaimed fiction at its finest, but the most powerful medication you can get without a perscription.
(Brought to you by Praetorian Publishing LTD) |
| #106 [36543] |
| fjwilson.reshall.ucsd.edu |
| Hmmm. Guess I didn't succeed in taking him seriously =). |
| #107 PsIoNiC~ZeRgLiN[36551] |
| sdn-ar-001nypougP157.dialsprint.net |
| Whoah, I think I was drunk when I did that post. Sorry all. |
| #108 Sp|nE[36573] |
| dialup16x25-pri.voicenet.com |
| what's my "style" ? |
| #109 dislekcia[36631] |
| netcache2.is.co.za |
Erf... I'm not going to go so far as to give my "rating" for this report, but I don't see why people think this isn't funny: Wridiculous, OMFG!
Half the humour was in the alt-texts.
Never, EVER play a 3 FFA with Ducky and .praetor. That was possibly the silliest game I've ever had...
-dis |
| #110 [36660] |
| fjwilson.reshall.ucsd.edu |
| I don't remember that game. Remind me =) |
| #111 Bruorton[36664] |
| 38.21.7.54 |
| Last comment! (?) |
#112  [36783] |
| dsl-gte-jr13661-1.linkline.com |
I found this really funny, and can recognize the insane amount of time you put into the graphics.
<b>10</b> |
| #113 <font color=yellow> |]agomar[36822] |
| gateway.ncdsb.com |
I dispute that pathetic claim that Praetor's and Drefsab's reports suck compared to William's.
They are all different
Dref's reports are some of my favourites, the best of these is probably his monday night series; kix ass. Few weaknesses, best quality in your reports is the humour, when the brs lack this they fall short, however.
Praetor's reports are awesome. I always read them on the crappy non-pix computer at my mom's. They manage to express everything they could've with pics, and are easy to carry around and/or read. Some do tend to get a bit boring, and sometimes you take your skills for granted. Look the Earth-shaking game br!!
William is another excellent reporter. He writes in a very engaging manner, and his pics absolutely rule, best ever. The only problem is he tends to overdo things sometimes, as was <i> slightly </i> the case in this br. But one look at the I hate medics chornicles, and you'll never dispute his skill again.
|
| #114 Fractal_Wave[37887] |
| 24.67.140.248.bc.wave.home.com |
This has gotta win the prize for most disjointed battle-report. Actually, no, that was his last work.
William, you've got so much skill, and too much time, and, I'm almost certain, an easy source of drugs.
Don't ever change. We love your work, oh Van Gogh of BR.com
(We'll see his ear at Bob's feet soon enough)
PLUR
All the best,
Fractal_Wave |
| #115 Rim_Jobe[37924] |
| slip166-72-161-17.tx.us.prserv.net |
| New trophy! The hardest to read catagorey! It goes to you my man.... but fear not... I will soon write a BR that is harder to read than your's!!!!! ; ) |
| #116 AgentN[38334] |
| 207.109.203.106 |
| <b>This is in Bold, as was the Report</b> |
| #117 AgentN[38335] |
| 207.109.203.106 |
| <i>This is italics, aswas the Report</i> |
| #118 TF_Pop$[38338] |
| 207.109.203.106 |
| <b>Tagname AgentN, Blue </b> AgentN is the best, i wish I was him |
| #119 TF_Pop$[38340] |
| 207.109.203.106 |
| <a>just checking</a> |
| #120 [38341] |
| 207.109.203.106 |
| <ing> |
| #121 TF_Pop$[38342] |
| 207.109.203.106 |
| <h2>Wassup</h2> |
| #122 [38345] |
| 207.109.203.106 |
| Okay, enuf of this <b>Sweet Report</b> <p> This was well, played written and commented |
| #123 [38347] |
| 207.109.203.106 |
| <Font Color=Blue>I rule </Font color> |
| #124 [38348] |
| 207.109.203.106 |
| <Center>Plz, don't ban me..I am just trying to use HTML </center> |
| #125 [43527] |
| adsl-208-190-205-217.dsl.kscymo.swbell.net |
korn sux
|
| #126 the randomreader[60800] |
| spider-wa071.proxy.aol.com |
| look! i can make a comment! im <i>special!</i> |
| #127 Bane[65988] |
| ifitl-61-191-140.atl.bellsouth.net |
this is my favorite report of all time
id give it a 10 if i could |
#128  [65989] |
| ifitl-61-191-140.atl.bellsouth.net |
| err forgot about codes :( |
#129  [75224] |
| HNW0511.RESNET-STUDENT.UPENN.EDU |
| I read the BR again and I went thru most of the comment section. If I were to rate again, I'll give a 8 or 9. Note that I dunno the rating before I post this, although I saw people giving 7 and 8 and 9. |
| #130 [75225] |
| HNW0511.RESNET-STUDENT.UPENN.EDU |
wheeee I just found this BR got rated 8.6
See we're good at this. |
| #131 CrackHeadJeb[88412] |
| mu-178245.dhcp.missouri.edu |
omg, the first chapter of my DrAwesome Chronicles got an 8.7 and this got an 8,6? 8*(
This was really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, great!
-CrackHeadJeb
10 |
| #132 EldritchEvil[114043] |
| nr11-216-196-184-246.fuse.net |
You missed two pictures, CHJ!!!!
BAD CHJ!!!!!
;) Just kidding. You did great. |
| #133 CrackHeadJeb[114124] |
| mu-197049.dhcp.missouri.edu |
Yeah, geocities deleted some of the minimaps for the games. Not too big of a deal imho. ;)
-CHJ |
| #134 ZerG~LinG[120248] |
| p418-120.ppp.get2net.dk |
| Last, on all WWC3 reports! |
| #135 Sorbent[139157] |
| AKCF3-GGI.xtra.co.nz |
Jeez zergling, I'm snubbing you on all of these WWC3 reports, hah
Sorbent |
| #136 Nobal[142551] |
| cache-da01.proxy.aol.com |
| I Just Would Like 2 know more about the ProtoZerg and what their units look like if someone have any pic's of them plz email me them at carlbbryant@cs.com :) thx |
#137  [151821] |
| nr11-216-196-189-209.fuse.net |
| Holleeeee |
Home
Forum
Starcraft Tournaments
