Battlereports.com your home for Starcraft Home Forum Starcraft Tournaments

"Tried Tested and True...Chevrolet. No, actually it's Lost Temple. Surprise"
-Fractal_Wave




#1 Zalbag[100768]
chi-tgn-guv-vty150.as.wcom.net
1st
#2 Breeze[100769]
dial78.stz.orbitel.bg
ha!
#3 Breeze[100770]
dial78.stz.orbitel.bg
...
T_T
#4 CaughtNaked[100771]
1Cust18.tnt4.damascus.md.da.uu.net
damn it, a few HTML errors there at the end. And as always, BAR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Me. O wells, no more bitching about lengh.
#5 CaughtNaked[100772]
1Cust18.tnt4.damascus.md.da.uu.net
that was fucking fast!
hope its not to hard to read, im gonna give up on styles from now on, mayb bar will go away, plz plz plz go away...
5
t2yl8r,
~CN



#6 CaughtNaked[100774]
1Cust18.tnt4.damascus.md.da.uu.net
O, and this is the last of the daily battlereports untill monday, sry. or ur welcome. :}
#7 CaughtNaked[100775]
1Cust18.tnt4.damascus.md.da.uu.net
shit, fucked up the ending, final push is the right anwser, sry.

ps im done spaming the comments

#8 Zalbag[100776]
chi-tgn-guv-vty150.as.wcom.net
i musta died like 30 times :P
#9 CrackHeadJeb[100777]
mu-196246.dhcp.missouri.edu
I'd redo this one if you screwed up the ending.

The white bar is almost unbearable by itself. ;)

-CHJ



#10 CrackHeadJeb[100778]
mu-196246.dhcp.missouri.edu
On another note, don't try to fight Monty Pylon for # of reports.

Quality > Quantity ;)

-CHJ



#11 Rowdy[100779]
adsl-64-123-174-217.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net
You caught the problems I saw. Nothing amazing, but it kept me busy (in a good way) for a few minutes.

Your last three reports had the white bar. FIX IT!

#12 Mistears[100781]
sc-66-27-40-71.socal.rr.com
err wtf?

double gate against zerg makes u lose?
teching to templars instead of goons makes you lose?
hohum..

5.







#13 |]agomar[100791]
St-Catherines-ppp112429.sympatico.ca
unfortunately, my rater tag doesn't work. I don't know why, but in any case, I'll rate this a 6.
#14 brcrook020[100792]
St-Catherines-ppp112429.sympatico.ca
Whew, I finally found it out again. Gah :)
#15 [100793]
St-Catherines-ppp112429.sympatico.ca
gah
#16 Phobos_ColZ[100795]
AC9683F9.ipt.aol.com
Someone teach this man HTML, fast! :P
#17 someone[100796]
sc-66-27-186-137.socal.rr.com
doooood you got some ZvP strategy to learn, as well as some skills coz yu suck dude
#18 Shadow D'Arc[100797]
spider-wp041.proxy.aol.com
Eh, it was okay. That last "Final Push/Take the map"(#13) is screwed up, plus the bar are the only HTML errors I saw, but I don't read HTML. Split the choices up more, so you don't sit there and read the entire thing all at once. WAY too linear, and each wrong move shouldn't be instant death, it should be 2 or 3 wrong moves to die. Ah well. T_Mac is gay.

Peace,
Shadow D'Arc


#19 [SM]Strega~F[100824]
proxy7.senet.com.au
Hmm, makes me glad that I didn't try this sort of report. =/
Interactives are bloody hard to pull off, so don't take the above line out of context.
=)
Emoticons > me


Strega
#20 Darth Sidious[100827]
155-1.fontys.nl
sorry, this one was kinda BS IMO.
#21 (...Blaze...)[100830]
aristoteles.ti.telenor.net
check my comment on last br on how to get rid of the bar.
#22 Eradicate~Me[100839]
pa-millscreek2a-123.buf.adelphia.net
this is stupid
#23 -{KoA}-Insomnia[100842]
ACB5A343.ipt.aol.com
any brers gonna have pics in their reports?
#24 [100846]
dial1308.acns.fsu.edu
Hey Dag, test your tag on a defunct report before you use it, so Mark4 doesn't have to keep changing the code ;)
#25 derek[100849]
ACAFAF1A.ipt.aol.com
THIS REALLY PISSED ME OFF, AM I THE ONLY ONE

JESUS
#26 CrackHeadJeb[100851]
mu-196246.dhcp.missouri.edu
no, you weren't the only one derek. It wasn't fun to read. I was disillusioned by it when I couldn't start out with a 2 rax opening vs a zerg opponent. ;)

-CHJ
#27 Jin Kazebari[100864]
1Cust109.tnt39.ewr3.da.uu.net
I felt really stupid reading that.....I don't know why, but I see like all the entries all in a row, and sometimes as I'm reading my eyes "jump" ahead.
#28 Baal_66[100881]
pD95146BD.dip.t-dialin.net
I have to agree, the report was highly illogic. If 4 lurkers drop, high templars usually kill them off pretty nicely and not mass goons. It is also quite unlikely that 4 lurkers rip a base into shreds.

Same with the Turbo Newbie, high templars storm them right away - at least that is what I do.

#29 Baal_66[100882]
pD95146BD.dip.t-dialin.net
How are the players supposed to take decisions if you give them no info on the enemy? If you had at least hinted a bit at what the Zerg was preparing, there would have been a logic decision, which hopefully would have been right.

I also assume that it was no real battle. Just think about having 2 cannons and 1 zealot with early forge and only 1 zealot with 2 gateways. This is simply wrong against the 4 pool, try the timing yourself, you will see that you usually can build a second zealot as soon as the lings arrive and along with a bit of micro the lings are dead. Being not capable of catching up anymore is also highly unrealistic, since the Zerg started off with a 4 pool.

I think you get the point. Perhaps take a real battlereport next time and think about what the victor could have done instead of what he has done which might have him lose.
#30 CaughtNaked[100921]
1Cust233.tnt4.damascus.md.da.uu.net
i knoe it doesnt make sence, but its fan fic :} and i had to do it in a day, im not shur why but i had to! 500++ hits, go me :}}}}
#31 TerrenMahem[100925]
1Cust5.tnt4.canton.tx.da.uu.net
Dude, no wonder i suck :P...i died lots of times...sense when did taking the map when you know the zerg has little expansions hurt?????
#32 LoneTemplar[101462]
h00a0cc74fb20.ne.mediaone.net
um...a few html and starcraft logic mistakes...such as, how can goons kill lurks when you never teched to observers? templar would Work though. dont write too many BR's dude! (1 per day!??! u got no life)

pretty good... if i was rater i'd say 6 or 7 of 10



Post a comment of your own here




You are not cleared to post comments, because we don't know you're not a spambot!

To comment, please Verify yourself now. [Requires cookies!]







Back to the Battle Report