Battlereports.com your home for Starcraft Home Forum Starcraft Tournaments

"I am not Davy i live in the same town of davy and it is called a very good ISP! so don't get bitchy at him thinking im him IM not ill regret this but my icq is 35148232 we are on at the same time(actually im always on)but IM NOT DAVY so dont think i am"
-Davy




#1 Shampoo[111559]
12-246-181-177.client.attbi.com
first
#2 TheDescolada[111560]
adsl-66-125-213-221.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net
No you bastard, i was sooooooooo close. 2nd.
#3 Executer[111561]
24.156.202.174
5 seconds after posting and I got ppl commenting already. =]
#4 Shampoo[111562]
12-246-181-177.client.attbi.com
that was close, i barely opened up the report =0
#5 Shampoo[111563]
12-246-181-177.client.attbi.com
Good first report, got a replay? Looks like a game worth watching IMO.

7

#6 Executer[111564]
24.156.202.174
sry shampoo. i wouldve saved one. but i had to logoff quickly cuz my mom was yelling at me. so i didnt get a chance to save it. =[

sry.

#7 Serious[111566]
h24-86-132-53.ed.shawcable.net
He didn't remember names, right? So it's pretty obvious he doesn't have replay... unless he's just plain lazy
#8 |||l||||ll|||||[111567]
cdm-66-7-108-tylr.cox-internet.com
that was some of the best reportish writing ive read in a LONG time, and for that i vote this get a 10

#9 Shampoo[111569]
12-246-181-177.client.attbi.com
oh well, good work =)
#10 xdragon[111571]
64.128.98.81
Indeed, it's quite refreshing.
#11 Chobo~Penguine[111575]
144.138.54.51
i havnt read it all yet but what i did read was really good - very indepth. If you include pics and stuff it would be greater than it already is!

#12 Me[111576]
sdcax57-048.dialup.optusnet.com.au
Pretty good 4 a first report.
just a few small mistakes like...

"Yippee! I quickly begin picking off probes in his scv line."

=)

apart from that, Good report






#13 Executer[111577]
24.156.202.174
DOH

yah, me, i guess i messed up there. =]

#14 [111578]
ncfmcc1-ext.nb.ford.com
Where do you find such newbies to play, and in a ladder game too?? No detection? No academy? The one guy builds hundreds of marines but doesn't bother with medics? How bout a couple science vessels? None of the four players, including the author was any good. You did a nice job reporting, but it was a whacked game.
#15 Snake[111579]
170.211.34.51
White was ok besides the detection problem.
#16 Snake[111580]
170.211.34.51
for a text only this report beats some reports with pictures i'd say about a 6
#17 Forever_Knight[111583]
170.158.213.44
Ack, if I wasn't manner I might make a suggestion that this game was made up...

Anywho, this report was kind of funny. Can you send me the hack that allows you to "I create the game called 1:1:1:1 Temple. So I join up. I enter the game room and I find that everyone else who is in the game has chosen Terran." I'd like to make the game and then join after eveyone else too...

Not bad. Well deserving of the 6 it received and I suspect gold for your next report. =]

-Forever_Knight





#18 SiG.[111588]
host-216-77-217-158.fll.bellsouth.net
I was totally ... what can I say.. disgusted.. when I read "You really cant defend Terran expansions early unless you use 2 bunks at you choke filled with 'rines or something"

I'm sorry man, but I early expo as Terran always in FFA, they are EZ as pie to defend.

1-Fact expo, make tanks w/siege fast, and get an ebay.

Land the CC at your nat, siege a tank by the cliff, build 2 turrets, and your set.
1 more fact, then a minute or 2 later, another.

Wraiths and goliaths as the ---ONLY--- sensible counter???

Uh. Tanks.. UUHHHHH tanks?







#19 SiG.[111589]
host-216-77-217-158.fll.bellsouth.net
K, read it.
Nice report, cept for that expo statement you made >.<
#20 Manius[111595]
adsl-20-91-251.asm.bellsouth.net
SiG! We had a streak going of non-flaming posts! lol. gj man, good report.
#21 Katome[111598]
px2ar.ed.shawcable.net
Writing was barely acceptable, but what really stands out is the incredible suckiness of all involved parties, and even worse professed knowledge -_- I find a 6 highly generous, I don't think this deserves more than a 5 unless its a sympathy mark for suckiness and first report.
#22 NotDefault[111601]
h24-83-95-176.vs.shawcable.net
"We've equalled out now, 2 expos each. (If you don't know why, read the report again)"

Actually seems to me you would have 3 expos. The northwest island, and the 12 main and natural. And... I wouldn't give this a 6. Maybe a 5. The writing was very very confusing.

And Forever_Knight, although I don't have very much evidence to prove it (it's all circumstancial) I think the game WAS made up. For example, he can't remember the names, even though he can remember every detail of this huge FFA. Also, he couldn't get the replay, even though he could play to the very end of the game - the replay button is just a little thing, it hardly takes any time. White (I think it's white) not making detection, even though he was smart enough to get Goliaths to combat the Wraiths, and could make a tank push into the middle (with turrets). Little things like that make me wonder.

NotDefault
#23 Forever_Knight[111602]
s31.dial1.pro.nac.net
The Death Knell for Executer:

Irrefutable evidence has been discovered that Executer, in fact, did make this game up. If he had truly won this professed FFA why would he be 0/2? There can be only two defenses:

1) He was smurfing on another name. (Not Likely)
2) He left before he got the win. (Also Not Likely)

Please report real games in the future. Or make it less obvious.

-Forever_Knight
#24 Executer[111603]
24.156.202.174
lol forever_knight, there's something called - using another name. dumbass. how do u know if i was on another name or not?
#25 Executer[111604]
24.156.202.174
and notdefault, if it doesn't was confusing, read it again...
#26 Katome[111605]
px2ar.ed.shawcable.net
Did I mention there was no html used whatsoever? I think this deserves a 4 max -_- Html 5, decent writing might have gotten it to a 6 but thats REALLY pushing it for a game this calibre.
#27 Forever_Knight[111608]
s20.dial1.pro.nac.net
If you're going to reduce yourself to base insults, I really feel no need to continue this conversation. The question is why, if you did use another name, would you smurf on a smurf or some such and then post the battle report under another name which is obviously a smurf as well? 0/2 can't be your main name. It makes no logical sense. On the other hand, you may be highly illogical in which case you will own yourself. Now or eventually.

-Forever_Knight
#28 Executer[111609]
24.156.202.174
lol, knight. u say u have no need to continue the conversation, and u keep talking. smurf? lol. is there a problem about using another name? i didnt think so. and y cant i post a br under a different name? lol.
#29 NotDefault[111610]
h24-83-95-176.vs.shawcable.net
I'm not going to read it again. I still want to know why you say you have 2 expos there, when the report indicates otherwise.

NotDefault
#30 John[111611]
adsl-63-206-92-172.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
Hmm you said you made a recent br.
#31 Executer[111654]
24.156.202.174
forever_knight, executer is my name, fucking newb. and notdefault, dont bother saying anything negative when your reports are just as worse.
#32 NotDefault[111663]
h24-83-95-176.vs.shawcable.net
"your reports are just as worse."

I'm sorry, but things like that make your report painful to read.

And you still haven't said why you said you had 2 expos when it seems you would've had 3.

And btw, just because I haven't written a 10 report doesn't mean I don't know one when I see one. Take movie critics. I highly doubt any of them have made a wonderful movie, but they still know what they're talking about (well, in general).

NotDefault
#33 Forever_Knight[111664]
s2.dial1.pro.nac.net
So Executer is your name but you never play on it? Way to be.

-Forever_Knight



Post a comment of your own here




You are not cleared to post comments, because we don't know you're not a spambot!

To comment, please Verify yourself now. [Requires cookies!]







Back to the Battle Report