| #1 Crazster[156635] |
| pcd414074.netvigator.com |
Sorry Dudes, this one only works in IE.
1st |
| #2 Desert Demon[156637] |
| bullhosting.com |
| 1 for IE only. |
| #3 Crazster[156638] |
| pcd414074.netvigator.com |
| F.U |
| #4 Crazster[156639] |
| pcd414074.netvigator.com |
| Short for my first try @_@. Hope it gets above a 5. I'm gonna stop spamming my comments now. You have the link now GO THERE NOW. |
#5 [156641] |
| nr11-216-196-184-146.fuse.net |
You linked to a .jpg. Pull it together.
Also, br.com hates CSS with the firey passion of a thousand suns. Always externally link when using CSS. |
#6 [156642] |
| nr11-216-196-184-146.fuse.net |
lolo you noticed
k i read now |
#7 [156644] |
| nr11-216-196-184-146.fuse.net |
Ehh, not bad. By the way: the king's champion is level a level 542 elite boss. It's pretty insane.
The report was... Decent, I guess. The writing had a couple of errors, but it wasn't bad, either. The problem was it was only on one quest. I guess I'll give it a 5. |
| #8 Crazster[156645] |
| pcd414074.netvigator.com |
Thnks. Criticism welcome for when I do my own ^^.
so
1. Get rid of all writing errors. However, it was decent.
2. Too short.
More pls ^^. |
#9 [156647] |
| nr11-216-196-184-146.fuse.net |
Uh... Don't do reports on WoW. WoW sucks for reports. Do stories on WoW with images -- there is a difference. Think graphic novel.
Next, come up with your own CSS coding and layout. Copying 'lings for the first one is fine, but after that, you have to start coming into your own. |
#10
[156648] |
| 83.72.192.168.ip.tele2adsl.dk |
Bwahahhahahaha
"The guards rush to stop the Elites, only to be swatted by flies."
Huge, level 60 elite flies!
Writing was so bad and unimaginative as hell. Pictures failed to load, layout broken (dont blame me, it wasnt made for 1024x768 screenshots).
I mean the quest was cool, really cool. Loads of potential lead down by bad presentation. I think I could make a more interesting WoW Story on me killing 15 Giant Moss Creepers.
1, +3 for some nice pics... I guess :O |
| #11 Crazster[156649] |
| pcd414074.netvigator.com |
| Ow. |
| #12 Crazster[156650] |
| pcd414074.netvigator.com |
| Any Idea whyt he white text didn't work for Mozilla users when in BR.com windowns, but why it worked outside? |
| #13 Cragspyder[156652] |
| dyn129-100-193-69.smh.reznet.uwo.ca |
OMG spoiler alert! I shouldn't have read it now everything is ruined!
>< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< ><
I'll never be able to look at that chick the same way again! |
#14 [156653] |
| nr11-216-196-191-42.fuse.net |
| I already told you. BR.com hates CSS. |
| #15 TheCheeseManCan[156654] |
| CPE000f3d63fc11-CM000f9f50cd74.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com |
Is this the Crazster from the Smith?
|
#16 [156655] |
| 68.79.174.39 |
The only thing really wrong with the CSS was that you had 3 digit HTML color codes like... #000, instead of #000000.
I changed those and it now looks good in all browsers.
I also widened the container div's width so that pics fit within it. |
| #17 Dibbler[156660] |
| 213-84-180-234.adsl.xs4all.nl |
| Great report! (I'm in the alt text) |
| #18 SnK-Arcbound[156661] |
| evrtwa1-ar11-4.14.88.79.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net |
| When are we seeing that next BR eldritch? |
| #19 Crazster[156673] |
| n219078046027.netvigator.com |
Yes this is the Crazster from the Smith :P
Thanks JV, I'll keep that in mind when I write my next report, which will be alot better and longer :)
Next time I'll try to finish it when i'm less frustrated and have the time to try and wonder if Br hates me. Haha, WHITE ON BLACK OWNS YOU.
Okay, and would this be a suitable way to get around the br hatying css. I post a report with a picture that is click linked to the actual report loaded into the report?
Is it bad for a first try? |
#20 [156679] |
| nr11-216-196-208-226.fuse.net |
SnK: Probably tomorrow or the next day.
Crazster: Yes, and maybe. |
| #21 Turbo_Noob[156682] |
| adsl-68-22-193-123.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net |
| I finally found someone who makes more comments in their own c-section then I do. Wassup crazster? |
| #22 Chris[156688] |
| astound-64-85-237-46.ca.astound.net |
Ignoring the quality of your text (I loosely use that word)...
Your report turned out to be just a few small paragraphs. Write more.
2.0, Mostly for errors, etc. |
| #23 Crazster[156708] |
| n219078216194.netvigator.com |
| Chris report challenge? We each make one and we see whos better? KK, you maked me up to 3 marks lower than a rater, next to someone reports that look like they were written in Germen, report challenge y or n? That or get off my report. |
| #24 Chris[156743] |
| astound-64-85-237-46.ca.astound.net |
stfu. Just because I don't write reports doesn't mean I don't know dogshit when I see it.
:) |
| #25 Chris[156744] |
| astound-64-85-237-46.ca.astound.net |
That was a little hasty of me.
Let's rephrase that. Your report was nothing more than large screenshots, with a light amount of text.
Also, considering that another person had to clean up your report for you, this detracts from your score.
10 - 5 (For poor, boring, and sparse writing. Your report shouldn't be "He died, she died, and I killed the mob.") - 2 (For unimaginative pictures. I thought they were boring and didn't add to the report) - 1 (for what sounded like to be major html errors with your report).
I'm not a rater, so you really shouldn't pay attention to what I think your report should be rated. Sometimes what I say isn't right, but please, don't "challenge me to a report". |
| #26 Crazster[156751] |
| n219078051070.netvigator.com |
| I'll take an insult when someone rates my report a 2. go and search for 2 rated reports and then see why i'm insulted. Fine I won't challenege you to a report, I'll just ask you this since you obviously don't like my reports. Don't read any of my other ones, please ever. |
| #27 maareek[156753] |
| 150.176.83.121 |
-_-
Chris is a little harsh, but he's normally right. I wish he'd comment more on my shit...but then I wish I'd write more too. |
| #28 Chris[156769] |
| astound-64-85-237-46.ca.astound.net |
Crazster, everyone starts somewhere.
I personally think that the raters are too generous everywhere, giving reports that don't deserve them scores higher than 1.
That doesn't matter though; don't take my rating so hard. I think very few people deserve 10s unless their report is of a professional quality. (Some on this site are.)
<3 maareek |
| #29 Crazster[156777] |
| n218103207026.netvigator.com |
Peace, I respect your opinion, and maybe i got a bit ott, it was late and maybe they rated it a bit high ^^. However its also how he said it. Its not easy doing it for the first time and he writes 3 insulting lines, some of which didn't even need to be there, it just worked under my skin. The next one will own :) I got the basics now.
Ignoring the quality of your text (I loosely use that word)...
Your report turned out to be just a few small paragraphs. Write more.
2.0, Mostly for errors, etc. |
| #30 iNsOm[157325] |
| evrtwa1-ar17-4-43-143-104.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net |
| this isn't a starcraft battlereport...Delete!! |