| #1 probe[34164] |
| 242849hfc187.tampabay.rr.com |
| tuhu |
| #2 xero[34165] |
| dial28.digital.bellville.pointecom.net |
| tehe |
| #3 tokenresistance[34243] |
| erbium-asy-84.rutgers.edu |
| Well, comment number three. I can't believe there's only two comments on this, and they have no bearing on the BR, when there's 90 + for another one nearby. The other BReport is certainly excellent, but ... Sheesh. |
| #4 Syndrome Zed[34247] |
| wmblab-Rye.neuro.emory.edu |
Nice report, Toke! I really liked the Doughnut Formation - I'm going to have to try and remember that next time I get zerg.
GL with your next game... |
| #5 D$^Gob_X[34253] |
| ns.wsd1.org |
| Wow, you fought a hard and close game, well I had a monumentous game recently too, I beat my ladder opponent with a rating over 1100!(Wow, who cares) Yeah, it's pathetic, but hey, I'm pathetic. |
| #6 Silent Strike[34290] |
| 149.freehold-06-07rs.nj.dial-access.att.net |
| Good report token. It seems as though your lurker drops would probably work better vs terran than protoss. |
| #7 tokenresistance[34302] |
| iridium-asy-29.rutgers.edu |
| Thx for the responses & +ve feedback. |
| #8 tokenresistance[34359] |
| erbium-asy-24.rutgers.edu |
| lookin' for constructive feedback on why I only got a "5" on this. Figured it wasn't a 10, but I also figured it for more than a "5". Did the same person that gave SZ a "4" on a very creative BR, and who seems to be in a bad mood, also rate mine? |
| #9 Silent Strike[34400] |
| jacksonsd.k12.nj.us |
Hmm.. the old guys get no love :(.
I really think your rating has something to do with your name. |
| #10 tokenresistance[34406] |
| erbium-asy-32.rutgers.edu |
SS: hehe, hopefully you're not right. Rating somebody's BReport on their playername would be ... not very deep.
I think it would be useful if the raters (or others) sometimes posted feedback to help BReport writers figure out how to do better. It is a little confusing to see SZ blatantly mistreated and this BReport get what seems to be overly harsh treatment. |