Battlereports.com your home for Starcraft Home Forum Starcraft Tournaments

"YRM, Team up with me on my "Cow-with-a-Band-Aid" Productions� and make mediocre reports of 4 pools on Bloodbath. After four weeks of them, you can post a picture of Kerrigan and get a 10.0."
-~CattleBruiser~




#1 Cer1dan[101963]
h24-81-10-214.ok.shawcable.net
1st, i want comments ^-^

#2 Cer1dan[101964]
h24-81-10-214.ok.shawcable.net
advice rather
#3 Franklin James[101965]
24.31.247.49
Sexy third
#4 ::Geist::[101966]
h24-79-190-212.lm.shawcable.net
if you dont have time then dont make a br
#5 Cer1dan[101967]
px2ht.ok.shawcable.net
dont be mean, my mom deleted all the pictures that i had done so far because i let her do somethin on the comp and i really didnt want to do them again. Even text only BRs can be decent, look at praetors
#6 BigD[101968]
24.67.77.181
All goliaths beating zerg. Hmmm....
Funny, needed pictures.
#7 Cer1dan[101969]
h24-81-10-214.ok.shawcable.net
i'll stick pics in the next of the series, sorry i didnt have em this time
#8 Dino Din[101970]
dynamic-150-142.dorm.natpool.uc.edu
Stop fucking stealing first comment on your own reports! It defeats the purpose of "1st", let someone have it. Damn you to hell!
#9 Cer1dan[101971]
h24-81-10-214.ok.shawcable.net
lol, i was gonna post something anyway because i forgot it in my report so i said "to hell with is, i'll just put 1st"
#10 John[101972]
adsl-63-206-90-151.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
It's an ok text-only
#11 [SM]Strega~F[101974]
proxy8.senet.com.au
Well, I'll give you some constructive criticism.
The text was very well done, and I didn't notice any spelling or grammar errors. You also covered the details extremely well, whilst the report flowed at just the right pace.
The only problem was the game itself. It seemed too beat-downish for a solid gold report. It was close, yes, but all the battles seemed to happen at his nautral. This will instantly lose you some points in the eyes of the raters.
That said, 6-7. 8 if you are lucky, but the quality of the game really handicapped you.


Strega





#12 [101976]
spc-isp-tor-58-23-275.sprint.ca
what strega said, except about the ratings, no way this is gold :) 6
#13 Dino Din[101977]
dynamic-150-142.dorm.natpool.uc.edu
this doesn't deserve a 6, jeez.
#14 Cer1dan[101978]
h24-81-10-214.ok.shawcable.net
heh, battles almost all were in his natural because I was constantly attacking after my first attack, there wasnt more than 10 seconds of silence so he'd have to beat my "godly" *coughcough* micro to get past his nat, oh well, good for a first try. ^-^ Plus, its a series, there will be others and as my rating goes up, the quality of the games do as well ^-^
#15 stonecoldnewbie[101979]
24.245.65.200
heh....this was ok i guess

it was above some of the reports posted here (see report below this) so id say maybe a 5.

#16 NotDefault[101981]
h24-76-173-79.vs.shawcable.net
The writing seemed ok, but the game stunk. Why did he keep building Mutalisks when you attacked with nothing but Goliaths? And since he Mutas did pretty much nothing against your Goliaths, why didn't he engage in some peon raiding in your base? I suck, and yet I can still pick out many many things he did wrong.

NotDefault

P.S. Next time, take pics.






Post a comment of your own here




You are not cleared to post comments, because we don't know you're not a spambot!

To comment, please Verify yourself now. [Requires cookies!]







Back to the Battle Report